Carbon cycle modelling and the residence time of natural and anthropogenic atmospheric CO2: on the construction of the "Greenhouse Effect Global Warming" dogma

Tom V. Segalstad
Mineralogical-Geological Museum
University of Oslo
Sars' Gate 1, N-0562 Oslo

The three evidences of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
(IPCC), that the apparent contemporary atmospheric CO2 increase is anthropogenic,
is discussed and rejected: CO2 measurements from ice cores; CO2 measurements in
air; and carbon isotope data in conjunction with carbon cycle modelling.

It is shown why the ice core method and its results must be rejected; and that
current air CO2 measurements are not validated and their results subjectively "edited".
Further it is shown that carbon cycle modelling based on non-equilibrium models,
remote from observed reality and chemical laws, made to fit non-representative data
through the use of non-linear ocean evasion "buffer" correction factors constructed from
a pre-conceived idea, constitute a circular argument and with no scientific validity.

Both radioactive and stable carbon isotopes show that the real atmospheric CO2
residence time (lifetime) is only about 5 years, and that the amount of fossil-fuel CO2
in the atmosphere is maximum 4%. Any CO2 level rise beyond this can only come from
a much larger, but natural, carbon reservoir with much higher 13-C/12-C isotope ratio
than that of the fossil fuel pool, namely from the ocean, and/or the lithosphere, and/or
the Earth's interior.

The apparent annual atmospheric CO2 level increase, postulated to be
anthropogenic, would constitute only some 0.2% of the total annual amount of CO2
exchanged naturally between the atmosphere and the ocean plus other natural sources
and sinks. It is more probable that such a small ripple in the annual natural flow of CO2
would be caused by natural fluctuations of geophysical processes.

13-C/12-C isotope mass balance calculations show that IPCC's atmospheric
residence time of 50-200 years make the atmosphere too light (50% of its current CO2
mass) to fit its measured 13-C/12-C isotope ratio. This proves why IPCC's wrong model
creates its artificial 50% "missing sink". IPCC's 50% inexplicable "missing sink" of about
3 giga-tonnes carbon annually should have led all governments to reject IPCC's model.
When such rejection has not yet occurred, it beautifully shows the result of the "scarethem-
to-death" influence principle.

IPCC's "Greenhouse Effect Global Warming" dogma rests on invalid presumptions
and a rejectable non-realistic carbon cycle modelling which simply refutes reality, like
the existence of carbonated beer or soda "pop" as we know it.

Theme by Danetsoft and Danang Probo Sayekti inspired by Maksimer